A Lesson on Power: Lie Big and Hit Hard.

Apparently, the city is bringing charges against the Camp4Unity Fifteen, pictured above. Mike Smith, also an arrestee, was handled separately by an ACCESS van and was unable to appear in the post-bust group photo.

Over June 8-9, about a hundred fifty people camped overnight at City Hall in protest of the Nickels administrations' relentless sweeps of homeless encampments. Since last May, the City has systematically attacked homeless campers, routinely throwing away the blankets, survival gear, and personal possessions of those who often have nowhere else to go.

2,631 people were counted outside of an overextended shelter system last January, a fifteen percent increase over last year. To accommodate those displaced by the city's campaign of criminalization and harassment, the City added twenty new shelter beds and hired a few outreach workers to offer pathetically inadequate "services" to the hard cases outside.

Despite nearly a year of strong activism by a variety of organizations, including the Church Council of Greater Seattle, the Interfaith Taskforce on Homelessness, Seattle King County Coalition on Homelessness, Columbia Legal Services, Jobs with Justice, and the Real Change Organizing Project, the Nickels administration has steadfastly held to their program of aggressive campsite clearances. The City Council, led in this matter by Human Services Committee Chair Tim Burgess, has refused to address the concerns of homeless advocates or demand accountability from the Mayor's Office.

So, on the Morning of June 9th, fifteen clergy, homeless people and their advocates, and student and labor allies walked out onto Cherry Street with a tent and refused to move. The event was one of those choreographed sorts of CDs where everyone knows exactly what's going to happen before it does. We were arrested after three warnings, handcuffed and loaded into a bus, and released to the sidewalk at West Precinct in less than an hour. The official RCOP video is here.

We achieved our objective, which was to get tons of press. At a time when the media was already growing more critical of the Mayor's policy, we gave them a big fat hook for their stories.

The Mayor and the City Attorney's office took their time deciding what to do with us. We weren't even sure we'd been booked. Apparently we were. Reverend Rich Lang was the first of us to receive any notice that charges have been brought. Today, he received his summons to appear in court on August 12th to face charges of Pedestrian interference (12A.12.015). There is an additional charge we weren't warned of when we arranged the civil disobedience action with police. This was filed under the statute relating to Obedience to Peace Officers, Flaggers, and Firefighters (11.59.010). Together, charges carry a threat of a $5,000 fine or 365 days in jail. The other fourteen of us will no doubt get our notices in the coming days.

The charges themselves are interesting. I sort of assumed that the pedestrian interference statute was about jaywalking and that sort of thing. Maybe at some time in the past it was. Now it's about controlling homeless people and suppressing dissent.

SMC 12A.12.015 Pedestrian interference.

A. The following definitions apply in this section:

1. "Aggressively beg" means to beg with the intent to intimidate another person into giving money or goods.

2. "Intimidate" means to engage in conduct which would make a reasonable person fearful or feel compelled.

3. "Beg" means to ask for money or goods as a charity, whether by words, bodily gestures, signs, or other means.

4. "Obstruct pedestrian or vehicular traffic" means to walk, stand, sit, lie, or place an object in such a manner as to block passage by another person or a vehicle, or to require another person or a driver of a vehicle to take evasive action to avoid physical contact. Acts authorized as an exercise of one's constitutional right to picket or to legally protest, and acts authorized by a permit issued pursuant to the Street Use Ordinance, Chapters 15.02 through 15.50 of the Seattle Municipal Code, shall not constitute obstruction of pedestrian or vehicular traffic.

5. "Public place" means an area generally visible to public view and includes alleys, bridges, buildings, driveways, parking lots, parks, plazas, sidewalks and streets open to the general public, including those that serve food or drink or provide entertainment, and the doorways and entrances to buildings or dwellings and the grounds enclosing them.

B. A person is guilty of pedestrian interference if, in a public place, he or she intentionally:

1. Obstructs pedestrian or vehicular traffic; or

2. Aggressively begs.

C. Pedestrian interference is a misdemeanor.

The second, unanticipated, charge, is about gratuitously upping the ante. It's one of those tools that are used to make charges more serious when that might be useful. Here's how this one reads.

SMC 11.59.010 Obedience to peace officers, flaggers, and firefighters. No person shall wilfully fail or refuse to comply with any lawful order of any peace officer, duly authorized flagger, or firefighter, who is at the time discharging the duty of regulating and directing traffic or pedestrians. (RCW 46.61.015)

That's it. Short and sweet. I suppose the first crime was to dissent by carrying a tent out into the street, and the second was to fail to stop dissenting when threatened with arrest and asked to stop.

Not long ago, I described the Mayor's homeless sweeps policy in terms of Joseph Goebbels' notion of the Big Lie, and quoted the Nazi propaganda minister himself.

“If you tell a lie big enough and keep repeating it, people will eventually come to believe it. The lie can be maintained only for such time as the State can shield the people from the political, economic and/or military consequences of the lie. It thus becomes vitally important for the State to use all of its powers to repress dissent, for the truth is the mortal enemy of the lie, and thus by extension, the truth is the greatest enemy of the State.”

A few months ago, when I wrote that blog entry, it crossed my mind that we had not yet arrived at the entire equation. In time, I thought, it will come to this, but it would probably be awhile. This is, after all, Seattle. I was wrong about the second part.

Why now? My guess is that the Mayor's Office is looking at Nickelsville, a survival encampment protest planned for sometime around the end of August, and thinking this might be an excellent time to make an example of some dissenters. Whatever they're thinking, we'll make the most of it. Let's play jujitsu.

Oscar's Got Your Stuff

It's worse than I thought. Just when I thought the City of Seattle has reached its lowest low in regard to their homeless sweeps policy, they've found a way to do me one better. Two displaced homeless campers went to the Westbridge storage facility this morning to retrieve their possessions, accompanied by a small delegation of suporters. There was an advocate, a lawyer, and an RCOP member who helped break this story last fall by documenting various illegalities involved in an early round of Kinnear Park and lower Queen Anne greenbelt sweeps.

It helps when advocates bring people to get their stuff, since the storage facility is about 10 blocks from the nearest West Seattle bus stop, only open a few days a week for a few hours at a time, and requires a valid state ID to get your possessions. There's also the matter of finding the right storage facility. If your camp is swept by the State Department of Transportation, your stuff is taken to a different site. This, of course, is a secret to those who might attempt to brave the various obstacles in the way of retrieving their belongings. It seems the City is less than committed to making things easy for people. Then there's the issue of whether your stuff might actually be there.

Those who have been following the sweeps issue closely may have noticed that the City has made much of the twenty-one tons of debris that were cleared from the lower Queen Anne greenbelt during last weeks media event/homeless sweeps. Presumably the bulk of this was composed of rotted food, human feces, bottles of urine, and hypodermic needles, since this was what most of the media — taking their lead from the Goebbelsesque City propaganda mill — saw fit to report. Joseph Goebbel's, for the benefit of the history-challenged, was the Nazi spin-meister who once said:

“If you tell a lie big enough and keep repeating it, people will eventually come to believe it. The lie can be maintained only for such time as the State can shield the people from the political, economic and/or military consequences of the lie. It thus becomes vitally important for the State to use all of its powers to repress dissent, for the truth is the mortal enemy of the lie, and thus by extension, the truth is the greatest enemy of the State.”

But I digress. Have you ever thought about just how much "21 tons" is? That would be 42,000 pounds. This is the equivalent of seven Hummers, or, if you prefer, fourteen Priuses. Let's say, for the sake of argument, that twenty-one campsites were cleared from this greenbelt last week. This would mean that campers from each site, over time, brought in 2,000 pounds of crap each. Who are these superhuman homeless people?

You might think, after such a major clearance, that the storage facility might be filling up. You would be wrong. The delegation to Westbridge found shelves that were largely bare. The entire Queen Anne Greenbelt clearance, with its 21 tons of "debris," yielded just one BB gun and a bike. That's all that was saved. One BB gun. One bike.

I reported here recently that a parks employee told me there were three bags of "personal items" saved from the site I watched get cleared last week. The delegation asked where these might be. Apparently, these bags arrived in a dampened state, and the decision was made to throw these away after all. So nothing from that site was saved. I don't recall a "dampness contingency" loophole in the protocols, but apparently these protocols have loopholes they haven't even invented yet. They just make them up as they go along.

There is a happy side to this story. One of the bikes had a flat tire and some other broken parts. The workers at the storage facility fixed it for the owner. Another man came to the storage facility in search of the work tools that the City of Seattle stole from him. These were deemed trash and thrown away as well. The Westbridge workers took him to their tool room and gave him what they could to replace what was lost.

This, to me, is a hopeful sign. The City's urge to break and destroy the lives of the most desperate is far from monolithic. There are those who, despite the poor behavior of their employer, still possess human decency.

The Westbridge delegation was told that the City knows they have a problem, and will now train their workers in the specifics of the protocols. Given the utter absence of City accountability, I'm a bit cynical as to the difference this will make.

In other news, Kinnear Park has now officially been posted for sweeps three times. Under the recurrent campsite clause of the City's protocols, permanent posting will occur after the next round of sweeps, rendering the application of protocols null and void in this area. No notification will be required. No services will be offered. No possessions will be saved.

I was projecting 3-6 months before the first major area was marked for gloves-off sweeps. I underestimated the evil of which these fucks are capable, and that is truly frightening.

Perhaps this is why the Westbridge storage facility is so pathetically out of the way, understaffed, and underutilized. They really don't intend to be using it for long